In Reply to: A horrible, pretentious, pseudo-spiritual crock. Sure to be liked by those who find Tarantino "deep." posted by Donald on August 5, 2005 at 22:35:30:
Do you ever provide anything more than conclusions? How about analysis, and, heaven forbid, some real examples from the film to support your argument? Or would that require too much thought? Or is there a parrot on your shoulder which tells you what to say, but does not tell you anything to support it's slogans?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: A horrible, pretentious, pseudo-spiritual crock. Sure to be liked by those who find Tarantino "deep." - jamesgarvin 15:58:53 08/07/05 (0)