In Reply to: Influential in what sense? posted by Mike K on June 26, 2000 at 17:48:36:
If influential means advancing the state of the art technology or SF as a literary form, I suggest these as considerationsNosferatu (1920s?) Downright scary even by today's standards. Use of shadows to create feeling of horror set a standard. So we call it a horror film today. In the 20s they might have called it scifi.
The Lost World (1925?) Use of model dinosaurs brought this technology to believability
King Kong (1933) Realistic interaction between models and live action figures set the standard for years to come. Made the monster into a creature worthy of pity rather than one to be feared.
Jason and the Argonauts (late 50s) I think I have this title correct. The sequence of the fight between Jason and the skeletons is incredible. If you have ever seen how this and other scenes in this SF/fantasy masterpiece were done as shown in the SciFi Network, you should be impressed. And this was before computer animation was available. I apologize if I missed the title.
Comments????
You have to look at these movies relative to the time at which they were produced not by today's standards. People will be laughing at "Star Wars" one of these days I bet. I saw "Around the World in 80 Days" several weeks ago, and wondered why everyone thought it was so hot when it came out. Oooop, I was one of them.
One thing about "2001" that is often forgotten is that it was originally shown in Cinerama. For those of us who are old enough to remember that form of presentation, it made that movie even better. Remember the railroad car coming at you in "How the West was Won"? Duck quick.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Influential in what sense? - Mike Craig 22:28:17 06/26/00 (0)