Topic - Kong-King------ - patrickU 09:27:19 10/27/05 (10)

• Re: Kong-King-- dubious doings - halfnote 20:16:01 10/31/05 (2)
• "I'm afraid it's going to amount to a 'colorized version' (in the Turneresque sense) of the original and nothing more." - Audiophilander 21:02:01 11/01/05 (1)
• Re: "I'm afraid it's going to amount to a 'colorized version' (in the Turneresque sense) of the original and nothing mor - halfnote 21:42:10 11/01/05 (0)
• $207,000,000 actually and probably growing... - ToshiroofKreplachastan 07:46:45 10/28/05 (1)
• Re: $207,000,000 actually and probably growing... - patrickU 08:07:07 10/28/05 (0)
• That's a lot of money to pay a hack to squeeze out a sub-aesthetic turd. -nt- - Donald 20:15:40 10/27/05 (4)
• Not so fast; Peter Jackson is a brilliant filmmaker - grinagog 20:59:23 10/27/05 (3)
• You have a point. - Dalton 23:59:52 10/27/05 (2)
• The previews show raging dinosaurs in the new "Kong". All the bases are covered! * - mr grits 18:01:10 10/29/05 (0)
• You may recall that the original 'Godzilla'* was dumbed down for audiences here.. - PCL 13:40:03 10/29/05 (0)