In Reply to: I thought it was a cleverly crafted work of Art (nt) posted by grinagog on November 30, 2005 at 00:17:03:
As per my response to another of the film's defenders, tell me what makes this bit of comic book of a movie (and, yes, I acknowledge Tarrentino's own homage to the influence comics have on his sensibility in the movie with the line-art interlude) a work of art.I admire some of QT's other work, but this one struck me as thin and predictable, more mired in the comic-book sensibility itself than distilling anything poetic or artistic from it.
Give me something to think about the next time I have a chance to see it. Maybe it'll change my view.
But what I saw the first time was a film that became preoccupied with the conventions of comic books and eastern martial arts films to the exclusion of almost every other cinematic concern. It seemed more like a film Beavis and Butthead would make, than one Tarrentino would make. I can almost hear them chuckling when the john is about to mount the pimped and comatose Uma Thurman.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "Work of Art"? - halfnote 20:53:21 11/30/05 (0)