Very good movie of a somewhat problematic book. In some ways improves on the book. Tha action and special effects are great. Harry and Kids are growing up. You should see how tall Neville has gotten. The teenage angst and problems are given fairly short shrift due to time constraints, I'd guess. They were not that entertaining in the book, anyway. A fairly non existent rendition of teenage lust. That is to say -5 on the erotimeter.Harry is growing up and contending with you know who. Won't tell you about you know who, but he is in here. Ralph Fiennes in perhaps the the second most entertaining role in the movie. I won't tell you the first. You should see it yourself.
I also thought that Prisoner of Ashkeban improved on the book, but what do I know?
Just for grins, anyone want to rate all the the Potter movies in order of enjoyment?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Harry Potter and Goblet of Fire - edta 17:49:33 12/01/05 (10)
- Is it suitable for an 8 year-old boy? - LarBo 14:19:28 12/02/05 (3)
- Thanks. - LarBo 16:44:16 12/03/05 (0)
- Depends on the 8 year old. - Harmonia 12:11:36 12/03/05 (0)
- Nope! - edta 19:48:02 12/02/05 (0)
- OK, here ya go. - Harmonia 23:57:04 12/01/05 (1)
- Yes, on your first. - edta 13:20:47 12/02/05 (0)
- People say this one was the best . . . they are all the same to me . . . - mr grits 18:17:02 12/01/05 (3)
- Ugly? Good vs. Evil. That's ugly, right? - edta 19:52:35 12/02/05 (1)
- Yeah, everybody's death but yours. * - mr grits 23:20:27 12/02/05 (0)
- Re: People say this one was the best . . . they are all the same to me . . . - Harmonia 00:01:24 12/02/05 (0)