In Reply to: Re: technique is just that: technique. * posted by Guy on December 16, 2005 at 01:39:16:
Hmm, I should've known better.....Sorry to have posted here. I didn't realize you folks were in the middle of a forum hissy-fit.
Had I scrolled down further and seen the previous posts, I would not have dared sugggest anything at all.
Look, it was just a passing thought. I haven't seen this movie in many years. At the time I saw it I was quite impressed with this photographic "technique". (It's very hard to do, you know. Try it.)
So I thought I'd make a passing comment. Sheeesh. Don't get your knickers in a twist. You'll wind up like Victor.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: technique is just that: technique. * - Bill McNeal 04:16:52 12/16/05 (3)
- Re: I don't believe any comment of mine is over-reaction * - Guy 10:02:29 12/16/05 (0)
- Re: You've just been Guy'd...(nt) - Jeff Starrs 09:24:18 12/16/05 (1)
- Re: As opposed to being ****sed? - Guy 11:42:16 12/16/05 (0)