In Reply to: Re: Obviously! Can't you write? posted by patrickU on December 16, 2005 at 12:36:52:
Peter Jackson's King Kong is magnificent and fun, unlike the crappy 70's remake! Peter Jackson reveres the original; Dino wanted to burn all of the original's negatives so that only his would exist!>>> "De Laurentiis. - Two days ago." <<<
Hmmm, I assume by your quick dismissive comments that either you haven't seen Peter Jackson's film yet or maybe you just prefer the campy 70's "Delorian" version and wanted to provide the correct spelling of your "respected" Director/Producer's name.
It wouldn't surprise me if your favorite De Laurentiis production was Mandingo, but let's not go there.
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "De Laurentiis." - That name cannot possibly be misspelled, even using just four letters that form an expletive. - Audiophilander 16:26:12 12/16/05 (5)
- Re: Can you give me the definition of the word " fa-na-tic?----nt - patrickU 02:36:12 12/17/05 (4)
- You & Victor dressed in Napoleonic garb dining in the south of France? Naw, that's too obvious! :o) - Audiophilander 09:50:47 12/17/05 (3)
- Re: You & Victor dressed in Napoleonic garb dining in the south of France? Naw, that's too obvious! :o) - patrickU 11:31:12 12/17/05 (2)
- Okay, Peter Jackson's best three then (my opinion), the LoTR trilogy. - Audiophilander 00:16:03 12/18/05 (1)
- Re: Okay, Peter Jackson's best three then (my opinion), the LoTR trilogy. - patrickU 07:16:03 12/18/05 (0)