In Reply to: Re: Ha Ha!! posted by EBerlin on December 21, 2005 at 10:12:50:
This is now quite different from what you wrote earlier: "He strikes me as someone who likes to highlight what's good in films"Always highlighting what is good is the job of an industry lackey, and Ebert is one. A true critic would try to evaluate the work in its entirety, which is far different from your "summary judgement" strawman.
There is nothing wrong with finding something good in an otherwise bad film, and pointing that out, provided one has guts and integrity to call it BAD. It seems like Ebert simply doesn't have guts, or, as some others put it, he is on the industry take, even if not overtly, and his job is really to assure good crowds.
My reaction would have been similar if you stated critic's job was in finding faults with the creation. As I said, neither would be true.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Ha Ha!! - Victor Khomenko 10:24:43 12/21/05 (11)
- Re: Ha Ha!! - EBerlin 19:00:37 12/21/05 (9)
- Re: Ha Ha!! - Victor Khomenko 05:58:04 12/22/05 (0)
- Re: Ha Ha!! - RGA 21:36:33 12/21/05 (7)
- And one other thing - jamesgarvin 08:45:35 12/22/05 (6)
- LOL! That is the most acute case of moral relativism - Victor Khomenko 09:01:47 12/22/05 (3)
- You are incorrect. Again. - jamesgarvin 09:26:48 12/22/05 (2)
- Re: You are incorrect. Again. - RGA 15:23:36 12/22/05 (1)
- Re: You are incorrect. Again. - Victor Khomenko 19:51:40 12/22/05 (0)
- Re: And one other thing - rico 08:59:08 12/22/05 (1)
- Re: And one other thing - jamesgarvin 11:38:20 12/22/05 (0)
- Re: Ha Ha!! - jamesgarvin 12:10:53 12/21/05 (0)