In Reply to: To the lowbrow EW's dissing of Syriana one may add the highbrow New Yorker. posted by clarkjohnsen on December 27, 2005 at 13:46:03:
almost unprecedented THREE pages to his review.
You must have skipped to the last sentence and missed the full review. Here's the first sentence for you: "Syriana," Stephen Gaghan's tense, outrageously complicated thriller about oil, the C.I.A., and the Middle East, is a major film without being a great film."
I hope you're a bit more honest in your business dealings, Mr. J, than you are on this forum.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Ah, the out of context Clarkism. Actually, David Denby dedicates an - tinear 16:36:14 12/27/05 (4)
- Gee- it says "NOT A GREAT FILM..." can't YOU read? - EdM 06:44:54 12/28/05 (3)
- In your universe, like Clark's, there is nothing between gold and shit? nt - tinear 16:22:12 12/28/05 (0)
- Exactly! But it was also a "major film" because some idiots said, "It made me think". Actually... - clarkjohnsen 07:39:32 12/28/05 (1)
- Which begs the question, of course, when - tinear 16:23:08 12/28/05 (0)