In Reply to: "The cheap, obviously-fake looking CGI." And where has it not been ever thus? nt posted by clarkjohnsen on December 27, 2005 at 10:21:14:
I agree that the digital creatures were largely digital looking. They were not cheap though. When has it not looked bad? The first Jurassic Park with the T Rex and the Raptors, Mighty Joe Young, At times Gollum in LOTRs. Digital is usually at it's worst when dealing with creatures. OTOH digital effects used for other things tend to be SOTA and often so good you never know there was any digital effect done at all.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "The cheap, obviously-fake looking CGI." And where has it not been ever thus? nt - Analog Scott 19:04:16 12/27/05 (5)
- "So good you never know there was any digital effect done." Now we're cooking with gas! - clarkjohnsen 07:27:07 12/28/05 (4)
- Oh please! The CGI in Narnia was SO obvious and inconsistent that it looked unfinished. - Audiophilander 11:43:28 12/28/05 (0)
- Re: "So good you never know there was any digital effect done." Now we're cooking with gas! - Analog Scott 10:03:57 12/28/05 (2)
- Re: "So good you never know there was any digital effect done." Now we're cooking with gas! - jamesgarvin 17:08:34 12/28/05 (0)
- "There is no way to fool anyone into believing they were not effects." If that's your stance... - clarkjohnsen 12:40:11 12/28/05 (0)