In Reply to: I can't express just how un-concerned I am posted by Victor Khomenko on February 24, 2006 at 12:25:30:
z
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "Enjoying good movies has nothing to do with [optical] quality." Huh! It certainly does in the theatre. nt - clarkjohnsen 13:35:22 02/24/06 (11)
- Huh! It certainly doesn't! - Victor Khomenko 13:52:48 02/24/06 (10)
- Re: Huh! It certainly doesn't! - SF tech 19:56:23 02/27/06 (2)
- Re: Huh! It certainly doesn't! - Victor Khomenko 13:28:26 02/28/06 (1)
- I understand your point... - SF tech 19:54:58 02/28/06 (0)
- Guess I'm just a *quality guy* in an unfocussed field. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:20:54 02/25/06 (1)
- Are we now down to the pro- and anti-iPod argument? - Victor Khomenko 08:42:09 02/25/06 (0)
- Well said but, let's remember, some films' (your Barry Lyndon, for example) - tinear 05:50:37 02/25/06 (1)
- While this is true, let's not lose the focus of this discussion - Victor Khomenko 06:44:47 02/25/06 (0)
- "To me the image quality is something one can quickly step over if films is good." - Unless you do it 'til you go blind! - Audiophilander 01:20:15 02/25/06 (0)
- size matters - Bersani 19:35:13 02/24/06 (0)
- Good Grief! This is worrying - dave c 16:16:48 02/24/06 (0)