In Reply to: Ingmar Bergman on Michelangelo Antonioni and Monica Vitti posted by La Dolce Vita on March 20, 2006 at 22:36:17:
theater and film, himself.
Yes,he had a few good films but hardly superior to Antonioni.
It is amusing to see two titans duke it out.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Bergman is a blowhard who never differentiated between - tinear 06:25:38 03/21/06 (16)
- Berggie is a bore fest who, somehow, got the favor of film intelligentsia . . . - mr grits 07:18:55 03/22/06 (7)
- I'm gonna go out on a limb and say the film intelligentsia know the most about film. - Donald 19:28:24 03/22/06 (1)
- Art is always opinion. * - mr grits 15:57:12 03/23/06 (0)
- Re: No you are dead wrong. He is passionating, spirituel and can be very funny in a Shakespearian way! nt - patrickU 09:49:56 03/22/06 (4)
- Comparing Shakespeare to Bergman... are you mad? As I - tinear 16:49:17 03/22/06 (1)
- Re: Comparing Shakespeare to Bergman... are you mad? As I - patrickU 03:16:20 03/23/06 (0)
- Let's agree to disagree on this one. * - mr grits 16:13:15 03/22/06 (1)
- Re: Try to re-see " Wild Strawberries" and then let´s disagree to agree. nt - patrickU 03:26:37 03/23/06 (0)
- And here I sense a little green fern dissing a redwood... nt - EBerlin 18:24:24 03/21/06 (7)
- I said he was a "titan." Now, ask yourself this about his art: - tinear 04:25:48 03/22/06 (6)
- Even when bleak, great art is ultimately uplifting and inspiring. -nt- - Donald 19:34:18 03/22/06 (0)
- I have "asked myself" about his art... - EBerlin 19:10:25 03/22/06 (4)
- Of course you're not the Pope! - tinear 10:07:38 03/23/06 (3)
- Do you actually mean to suggest... - EBerlin 11:48:28 03/23/06 (2)
- Nope. - tinear 16:14:42 03/23/06 (1)
- And thank you for the ad hominem attack! - EBerlin 18:39:19 03/23/06 (0)