In Reply to: Re: Harry Potter and the Gobelet of Fire---- posted by Analog Scott on April 12, 2006 at 09:36:34:
Ha-ha!Well I meant with " shit " a big commercial product, that was more on the lovely side...From me.
I do not know if it was shot on digital, but many film are done that way now and even when shot on real film, many are digitally proceed in the final stage.
I meant the digital effect, I did not go in details for this film because I though nobody here would care!
The same was meant fo K-K, not the film but the effect, the trickery if you want.As for digital versus celluloid, it is a very long subject, each of the proceding has his advantage.
For me, it is of course, the old fashion way I pretend to like much more.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Harry Potter and the Gobelet of Fire---- - patrickU 09:52:04 04/12/06 (5)
- you made the same wrong assumption as audiophilander - Analog Scott 10:32:58 04/12/06 (4)
- Re: you made the same wrong assumption as audiophilander - patrickU 11:14:28 04/12/06 (3)
- Re: you made the same wrong assumption as audiophilander - Analog Scott 11:22:33 04/12/06 (2)
- Re: you made the same wrong assumption as audiophilander - patrickU 06:39:46 04/13/06 (1)
- Re: you made the same wrong assumption as audiophilander - Analog Scott 08:42:52 04/13/06 (0)