Mates,As the World is under a complete media assault to promote the new movie version of DaVinci Code, I thought I'd look into the book and see what the fuss is all about. While on a recent trip, I was able to make it through about two thirds of the Brown book.
Though I rarely, rarely read fiction, this is the kind of fiction that would ordinarily appeal to me: arcane references and art analysis combined with a murder, metaphyscics/religious history, and chasing around monasteries and libraries- information important enough to cause murder.
The thing is, this was all familiar territory- Umberto Eco's "The Name of the Rose" has very similar elements- it opens with a murder with religious implications at stake that the main character must solve and the Rosacrucians and various 14th C. heresies are all woven into the plot. And the theme of what the Church should supress and at what cost has a similar ring.
The difference with Eco- who is wordy to distraction- is the Brown book has such amazingly dull writing and annoyingly amateur whodunit habits. From the first paragraph the book seems a feeble scenario for a movie- the writing is so oriented towards a movie realisation, I felt I was reading a draft for a screenplay- the plot points are completely conventionally placed for a screenplay as is the structure of three acts. The devices to create anticipation such as the gradual revelation of key elements when the author feels there needs to be a boost with something dramatic- is highly annoying. Dan Brown should read Sherlock Holmes as well as the "Celestine Prophecy"- again. He shouldn't be afraid of plagarism- Brown can afford any defense and the publicity will only sell more books. The interweaving of fact and fiction is expert, but in the end makes an uncomfortable bridge between interpretive history and discount plot conveniences. Sorry to the 50,000,000 readers, but I though this was a mediocre book all along. I should of course finish the book, perhaps I'm missing beautifully rendered plot twists- and these have the skillfulness of product placement- but I really didn't care about the characters, derivative plot contraptions, or the religious implications enough- have you ever read a book and wished the murderer had been more enthusiastic and killed everyone before the story opens? The central idea too is hardly original either: Remember in "Last Temptation" Jesus has a fantasy- whilst on the Cross- of a complete married life- sex and children- with Mary Magdalene? The marriage with MM was the actual "last" temptation- and the "devout" objected then too.
Of course, the religious zealots will hate this book and movie as it challenges dogma about the life of Jesus, but their opposition will have the same effect as it did for "Passion" and "Last Temptation", "Dogma" and the others- anything with "unapproved" scenario will be objectionable- and the publicity will send more people to see it.
Are Americans so hungry for entertainment that has even a modicum of clever, they're willing to put up with convenient forced conclusions, adding soft-headed religious content and make such a fuss over this story? The many contrivances and poor, conventional writing is quite off-putting enough, and perhaps I'm missing exciting conclusions, but based on the book- and the parallels with the very uneven "Name of the Rose", I think I'll be waiting for "DaVinci Code" to appear on HBO in Winter 2006- it will replace "It's a Wonderful Life" as Holiday cheer- and that's soon enough.
Cheers,Bambi B
K.T. magnum emiritus
Quid rides?...De te fabula narratur
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - DaVinci Code - Bambi B 08:13:13 05/18/06 (40)
- Here's the deal... - RGA 05:58:23 05/21/06 (0)
- I jut saw it. - Analog Scott 20:14:44 05/19/06 (4)
- Re: I jut saw it. - rico 13:10:06 05/20/06 (3)
- it's turd ....and then some.... - Mellson 17:47:31 05/20/06 (0)
- Good point - Analog Scott 14:57:07 05/20/06 (1)
- I take it no one got to say "Surly you can't be serious!" in the movie? nt - Alex S 17:55:37 05/20/06 (0)
- Ron Howard 's comment - BJordan 18:34:14 05/19/06 (1)
- Hey, Opie, will I sleep 20 minutes the second time or just the standard 10? * - mr grits 19:27:04 05/19/06 (0)
- The film critics... - mkuller 11:10:08 05/19/06 (0)
- People who haven’t read the book and or read the critic comments... - millen 09:28:47 05/19/06 (1)
- That would be me.. - Analog Scott 20:18:11 05/19/06 (0)
- "The movie is handsome and hogtied and dour as a parson." -- Boston Globe nt - clarkjohnsen 08:35:00 05/19/06 (4)
- Do you think for yourself? NT - RGA 05:42:51 05/21/06 (3)
- it was called "two thumbs up" but I lost all my respect for them... this is turd.. - Mellson 11:59:21 05/21/06 (0)
- More often than RGA behaves pleasantly. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:00:03 05/21/06 (1)
- Why not post your thoughts on film? - RGA 04:22:59 05/24/06 (0)
- Any film that pisses off the Catholic Church - LWR 19:19:57 05/18/06 (2)
- Bitter, bitter. Plus, the film is a bust. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:32:41 05/19/06 (1)
- A bust? Teh theater i was in at 4:45 was sold out. - Analog Scott 20:19:49 05/19/06 (0)
- another example of Hollywood bean-counter mentality... - BJordan 18:50:58 05/18/06 (1)
- They took their cue from the success of American Idol - MMasztal 03:59:47 05/19/06 (0)
- Re: DaVinci Code - patrickU 12:53:45 05/18/06 (7)
- Well if some at Cannes laughed it must be horrible - Analog Scott 20:21:49 05/19/06 (6)
- A sudden ivory tower - Victor Khomenko 06:11:59 05/20/06 (5)
- If thinking for one's self is seen as an ivory tow er then.... - Analog Scott 08:55:06 05/20/06 (4)
- One can always compare Oscars with Cannes, or Berlin... but one can do whole lot better. - Victor Khomenko 12:17:51 05/20/06 (3)
- I didn't actually compare the Oscars with Cannes. - Analog Scott 13:02:08 05/20/06 (2)
- Re: I didn't actually compare the Oscars with Cannes. - Victor Khomenko 13:30:20 05/20/06 (1)
- Re: I didn't actually compare the Oscars with Cannes. - Analog Scott 15:14:24 05/20/06 (0)
- Its more like an insult than a challenge to faith - DWPC 12:01:12 05/18/06 (7)
- me thinks you are taking it waaaaaaay too seriously - Analog Scott 20:29:42 05/19/06 (0)
- Yeah! Imagine a show or movie ridiculing glat kosher. How would *that* go over? We can't even have a cartoon of Mr. M. - clarkjohnsen 13:13:19 05/18/06 (4)
- I fail to see how this book/film can be considered to be ridiculing christianity... - dave c 20:01:59 05/18/06 (3)
- excuse me but it is certainly not a widely held viewpoint - ArdRi 22:02:09 05/18/06 (2)
- Are you suggesting our antagonist is a "bizzare reprobate"? Maybe he's just a down-on-his-luck Merovingian. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:32:05 05/19/06 (0)
- 3 things I don't understand - dave c 00:10:40 05/19/06 (0)
- To what faith? - patrickU 12:33:09 05/18/06 (0)
- Re: Ha-ha! - patrickU 10:17:41 05/18/06 (1)
- "It challenges dogma about the life of Jesus." LOL! - clarkjohnsen 08:56:27 05/18/06 (1)
- "Christians have convictions." - Yeah, and more coming if the Special Prosecuter does his job right. (nt) - Audiophilander 00:52:35 05/19/06 (0)