In Reply to: For those who READ "The DaVinci Code" . . . posted by mr grits on May 20, 2006 at 15:38:08:
Two points...by including opposite side of the argument in the film, producer/director and the script writer have no balls at telling the story like what it is...
secondly, the biggest problem is this..anagram was never explained as to what it means to Leonardo... Mona Lisa was never explained as an anagram and this is to established the importance of Leonardo Da Vinci....else... who cares about The Last Supper, all the clue solving and the importance of divine feminine energy as represented by Mary M. and all the arts and history etc??so the movie didn't sell the story strongly, and it included what was never there to weaken its own argument.... it's bleached and dry washed..
plus the lusy directing and acting, it's a stinky bumb of the century..
Also, cutting/editing is a patch.
yeah I am still angry...LOL.....;-) I never thought it could be taht bad...
Mellson
Happy Happy living...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- it is... - Mellson 18:07:43 05/20/06 (3)
- Clearly a bad movie . . . why did they even think it was worth releasing? - mr grits 22:13:35 05/20/06 (2)
- Well, for starters it made 77 million 1st weekend domestic box office, NT - DavidLD 13:22:31 05/22/06 (0)
- Re: Clearly a bad movie . . . why did they even think it was worth releasing? - Wendell Narrod 16:01:47 05/21/06 (0)