In Reply to: "Fiction" posted by DWPC on May 25, 2006 at 13:42:17:
Dan Brown's whole premise is either based in pure speculation or downright lies (see Plantard's Priory hoax for a prime example). There is very little in the way of "fact" to be found, and to defend it as such is only adding fuel to the already overdone controversy.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Well said - mishmashmusic 14:45:34 05/25/06 (1)
- This would not be so controversial had Brown in his preface not asserted the utter truthfulness of his invention. nt - clarkjohnsen 07:52:21 05/26/06 (0)