Board,Let me explain: don't know the precise word, but I mean technological wizardry and gadgetry and gimmickry employed by a filmmaker as opposed to the serious content of the film. Is there an inverse relationship: the more razzledazzle, the less content.
Thoughts?
Thanks.
Guy.
* Making No Compromise with the Public Taste *
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - A Correlation between razzledazzle & serious content in films? - Guy. 07:49:54 06/02/06 (6)
- Re: A Correlation between razzledazzle & serious content in films? - AudioHead 09:59:36 06/02/06 (0)
- Fourth Modern Prinicple Of Movie Making - mishmashmusic 08:24:06 06/02/06 (4)
- Re: Fourth Modern Prinicple Of Movie Making - newbear 21:48:22 06/04/06 (0)
- Choice? Seems most filmakers are completely unaware of having any...N/T - musetap 10:57:45 06/03/06 (0)
- Instead of "cut to chase" time to say "cut to effects" - Victor Khomenko 09:21:59 06/02/06 (0)
- Re: Fourth Modern Prinicple Of Movie Making - Analog Scott 08:32:42 06/02/06 (0)