The reviews I noticed ranged from C- to three stars. Now I can see both points of view.If Linklater rotoscoping is your only thing, Waking Life was a better movie.
If waiting for a payoff is your only thing, then definitely Darkly.
If talkiness is your thing, it's Darkly again -- but not by a long shot.
If Robert Downey Jr. at his feyest is your thing... well, he wasn't in Life but he's truly great in Scanner.
If Keanu Reeves *isn't* your thing, this one will surprise you; he's great too. So is Wynona Ryder.
And now we come to Philip K. Dick.
Personally I consider his Radio Free Albemuth one of the handful of Reality Books on my shelf; A Scanner Darkly, while not ascending to that level nevertheless has it moments, with a true paranoid's paranoia realized in the final plot twist about his drug-disintegrated protagonist (Reeves). Just two words to remember: Blue flowers.
However, I did not find the two sides of his brain-split very well handled, leading to a static rather than a dynamic relationship there, with each's awareness of the other unexamined -- although I also can't see what might have been done to improve matters.
Dick was not however much of a prose stylist (I even embarked on line-editing my copy of the book) while Linklater's movie is very stylish indeed. The result: The book has more raw power, but if you don't want to go there, the film is fine if you can accept its talkitiveness.
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - A Scanner Darkly - clarkjohnsen 09:38:48 07/10/06 (2)
- Thanks for that... - Harmonia 09:57:29 07/10/06 (1)
- Right reaction! Just don't say I told you to go... nt - clarkjohnsen 07:35:20 07/11/06 (0)