In Reply to: Re: He epitomises the insignificant self-absorbed individual, in my view posted by patrickU on October 19, 2006 at 13:02:52:
I kind of feel what you are saying, I understand all that, but being part of history, even being completely true to a part of history, doesn't make one significant or pleasant or interesting.In addition, French cinema of that time produced some truly great actors. In his case his physical size is commensurate with his presence, I think.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- True to an extent - Victor Khomenko 14:29:10 10/19/06 (5)
- Re: Just a pawn in a game-- - patrickU 05:15:58 10/20/06 (0)
- He wasn't supposed to be John Wayne. He occupies a special place in - tinear 04:14:59 10/20/06 (3)
- Re: He wasn't supposed to be John Wayne. He occupies a special place in - patrickU 05:22:12 10/20/06 (0)
- "He wasn't supposed to be John Wayne." No? Well, OK... but I'd take Belmondo any day - Victor Khomenko 05:09:23 10/20/06 (1)
- I think he was very effective in Last Tango, too. I once sat next to him in - tinear 18:01:09 10/20/06 (0)