In Reply to: I can't believe your take on this... posted by EBerlin on November 14, 2006 at 20:49:59:
a film which, being a Bergman vehicle, has thought behind it.
My point is that, like Freud, Bergman has centered upon the neurosis of a middle-class woman. Great art should have great subjects: Imagine Hamlet without Claudius's crime. He'd be just another disaffected teenager, wouldn't he?
Poor little filthy rich actress and her nurse/governess: boohoo. Where's the dynamic struggle? Mental illness? Not really, is it? She seems to be playing a game, as the whispering scene suggests.
Yes, it's a clever, entertaining, and beautiful film but it's not great. And, yes, I understand the playing off of the persona of an individual, of an actress, and of another person that is NOT an actresss... what is real and what is artifice.
In the end, superficial people, both of them, and not very "important."
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Yes, I've agreed with you, it's quite beautiful. But it's not just a poem but - tinear 16:49:06 11/16/06 (4)
- Well... - EBerlin 18:07:36 11/16/06 (3)
- Re: Well... - Rod H. 08:54:58 11/17/06 (1)
- Sorry, meant to post to tinear, not you EBerlin * - Rod H. 09:08:06 11/17/06 (0)
- Okay, but I wish you could articulate what you think I'm missing. nt - tinear 22:31:27 11/16/06 (0)