In Reply to: Re: Fourth time around--- posted by patrickU on November 28, 2006 at 09:25:49:
Neither you nor I have seen this film. Yet there you are, shooting your virtual mouth off with a pre-emptive review, trashing it based on a few scenes in a trailer that didn't float your boat.When one is critical of a film he/she hasn't seen the only basis for forming that critical opinion is to proffer a preconceived (biased) notion. While one CAN express an informed opinion about another poster's biases based on their peculiar habits and assertions, how does one review an unseen film?
The bottom line: If you're going to express an informed opinion at least get the informed part right! Is that clear enough, mon ami?
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I've seen the same preview for Eragon that you did; here's my perspective: - Audiophilander 10:05:55 11/28/06 (8)
- Ssssh, tell'em Bergman directed it under a pseudonym. * - mr grits 16:46:26 11/28/06 (1)
- Re: Yes take " Grits " as synonym---nt - patrickU 03:46:36 11/29/06 (0)
- Re: I've seen the same preview for Eragon that you did; here's my perspective: - patrickU 10:22:00 11/28/06 (5)
- "What ? I am unfair?" - YES, and your rhetorical denial of it merely emphasizes your Grey Poupon arrogance. - Audiophilander 15:07:25 11/28/06 (4)
- Re: Yes, you are right--- - patrickU 03:27:37 11/29/06 (3)
- "That is the perfect film for both of you." - How would you know? You don't know us any better than you know the movie! - Audiophilander 09:53:09 11/29/06 (2)
- Re: Want to bet? - patrickU 10:05:28 11/29/06 (1)
- You're getting kind of desperate for attention, aren't you? - Audiophilander 12:33:27 11/29/06 (0)