In Reply to: Re: It always annoys me when I am aware of holes... posted by RGA on December 18, 2006 at 19:26:53:
"He is a 37 year old actor no? The man is ripped. To be ble to do all that Bond is capable of doing - he ain't 25. So you are reading a lot of holes into things that don't exist."WTF? what does the actor's age have to do with the price of tea in China much less the plot holes in the movie?
"It's like the scene where someone below is arguing that Vesper happens to be walking through the parking lot. These issues can easily be explained away in cutaway scenese -- maybe she saw him from the window and went down - or saw him leave the game and followed.
Films do actually occasionally require the viewer to fill in what is not directly stated. Though yes some people like everything spelled out word for word."Actually it requires the film makers to create plausable explinations to fill in the holes. This one is ridiculous. She was in the fricken casino when he left. If she saw him go to the car then she saw he was in distress. so her casual "oops look what I stumbled upon" discovery of Bond, dead in the car, was STUPID. Not to mention that she just happend to know what he was trying to do with his gadget and was able to fix it with no knowledge of the device. These are minor issues compared to some of the holes in this idiotic movie. Lets not forget that he goes back in and continues the game as if nothing happened. No, there wouldn't be secret service people from both sides of the pond all over the place would there? No, no one would try to nail the girl for trying to kill Bond would they? Of course not. And no one was smart enough to use this as a legitimate reason for postponing the game and putting the preasure on the guy that way? No, to smart and too boring. well that is the fault of the film makers for putting their cards in ::couh:: a card game. A stupid idea through and through that simply lead to more and more stupid plot holes. You know, like the one where the bad guy loses the game and goes unprotected by any secret service people for the night even though there were at least two foiled attemtps to kill him during the game. Yeah that aint fricken moronic. Again I could go on and on becuase the movie is soooooo stupid but I am getting as bored talking about it as I was watching it. But I have to mention the stupidest part (already mentioned but I feel it deserves rementioning) the fact that the new airplane not being destroyed would do NOTHING to cause the guy to lose that money he is holding for terrorists. WOW WOW was that a major screw up. This movie was three stylistically different demos for stuntmen doing chase scenes, one boring card game and one stupid twist and a ridiculous visual effect of a building coming down for ten minutes. WOW sooo bad.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Me thinks you are desperate to defend a turd - Analog Scott 20:38:01 12/18/06 (1)
- Re: Me thinks you are desperate to defend a turd - RGA 05:00:09 12/19/06 (0)