In Reply to: Why not? It looks charming. Let him. posted by Victor Khomenko on December 27, 2006 at 10:45:15:
Clark was engaging in a bit of unsolicited sardony in his first riposte (Johnsen waxing, so to speak) that was over the top since he was posting what amounted to a festival notice rather than a critical endorsement or denouncement of a film he hadn't seen.The butt-bank is merely a visual icon representing Clark's below the belt 2 'scents' worth.
As for the "his post was angry, personal and totally dumb" part, you'll need to put some new elastic in your Napoleonic tutu if you want to make the facts fit your stretched definition. ;^)
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "...his post was angry, personal and totally dumb." - Not by a long shot, bub, and you can take that to the bank. - Audiophilander 11:24:47 12/27/06 (0)