In Reply to: 201 A Space Odyssey. You get from this movie what you bring to it posted by Analog Scott on January 4, 2007 at 10:57:08:
2001 is one of those films that while it is science fiction really isn't about space - not really -- in fact the lengthy space sequences remind more of Waiting for Godot. The vastness of the unexplainable with the human mind really no better than a monkey playing with a bone.The trick, if there is one to watching this movie, is to watch it NOT for science fiction but for philosophy. Certainly it will work on the levels presented - I have purposely avoided reading any critical essay on the film for the very reason that I may inadvertantly adopt one of the many points of perspective about this classic - I would rather just watch it and garner what it has to offer.
You bring to all great art a perspective - great art asks you to become part of the equation and to generate interpretations of what Kubrick was really talking about.
The problem though with this film is that most people need eveything spoon fed to them.
You take Star Trek which IMO was always a much better television series than it ever was on the big screen, because the ideas on the small screen were traded in for the big special effects and shootem-ups on the big screen. That is with the exception of Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- First time - Hated it, second time - respected it but didn't like it, third time - in my top ten of all time. - RGA 08:46:43 01/05/07 (15)
- Re: First time - Hated it, second time - respected it but didn't like it, third time - in my top ten of all time. - Tom Brennan 09:03:28 01/05/07 (8)
- Re: First time - Hated it, second time - respected it but didn't like it, third time - in my top ten of all time. - Tapetastic 16:01:53 01/07/07 (0)
- All "great art" asks you to bring something to it... - RGA 02:12:08 01/06/07 (0)
- Re: First time - Hated it, second time - respected it but didn't like it, third time - in my top ten of all time. - Analog Scott 09:36:06 01/05/07 (5)
- Re: First time - Hated it, second time - respected it but didn't like it, third time - in my top ten of all time. - Tom Brennan 11:21:16 01/05/07 (4)
- Re: First time - Hated it, second time - respected it but didn't like it, third time - in my top ten of all time. - Analog Scott 11:39:55 01/05/07 (3)
- Re: First time - Hated it, second time - respected it but didn't like it, third time - in my top ten of all time. - Tom Brennan 13:23:11 01/05/07 (2)
- Re: First time - Hated it, second time - respected it but didn't like it, third time - in my top ten of all time. - Analog Scott 15:20:12 01/05/07 (1)
- Re: First time - Hated it, second time - respected it but didn't like it, third time - in my top ten of all time. - Tom Brennan 15:25:01 01/05/07 (0)
- Cool... how many chances did you give 8 1/2? (nt) - Victor Khomenko 09:01:54 01/05/07 (5)
- I haven't seen it yet - Analog Scott 09:37:01 01/05/07 (4)
- On a scale of one to ten, I'd give it what's left (1 1/2). - Audiophilander 10:45:20 01/05/07 (0)
- I am surprised.... why? You seem to have been around the block. - Victor Khomenko 10:38:18 01/05/07 (2)
- Re: I am surprised. why? - Analog Scott 11:45:30 01/05/07 (1)
- I didn't need multiples, but then I was already well primed to appreciate the Master - Victor Khomenko 12:06:10 01/05/07 (0)