In Reply to: So I fainally got to see 300 posted by dave c on April 17, 2007 at 00:14:53:
"(Please it was my symbol!!)..." If I am reading this right you are owning your interpretation rather than projecting it on the film makers. I have no problem with that. people are free to read what they want into things. But know this, the things you are interpreting as symbolic of today's politics really did happen. I don't think the real Leonidas, Xerxes, Spartans or Persians ever thought their battle would be symbolic of anything 2500 years in their future. The Spartans were in spirit portrayed with brutal accuracy. The movie was about that event and the film makers never intended it to be symbolic of anything else other than the universal truth of the nature of self sacrifice."Xerses himself was wonderfully... hey who said no one thought of the homo-erotic thing during this film??!!??"
I siad no one I know of thought of Xerxes being gay while shooting this film. We always meant to portray him as an androginous/omni-sexual narcissist. As for the eroticism we were thinking that it was, in this case, far more equaly distributed between male eye candy and female eye candy. So other than the kissing concubines and a few transvestites in Xerxes tent the eroticism was mostly heterosexual. Of course lesbians were free to be aroused by Lena Heady or the Oracle or the Persian concubines and gay men were free to be impressed by the Spartans. But I would say it was far more an equal opportunity erotic movie than a homo-erotic movie.
Glad you enjoyed it.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- First I am glad you enjoyed it as for your interpretation.. - Analog Scott 09:52:35 04/17/07 (2)
- To be accurate, you'd have portrayed ALL the Spartans as gay. They - tinear 04:38:28 04/18/07 (0)
- Carry on camping - dave c 14:17:57 04/17/07 (0)