In Reply to: Ratatouille: Criticisms posted by clarkjohnsen on July 18, 2007 at 10:08:51:
I doubt that the increase in star ratings was accidental as so much attention was paid to accuracy elsewhere; it was probably a conscious decision by Pixar. Most folks in this country think in terms of 5 star ratings, so going with a 3 star rating would probably draw more attention to itself, perhaps confusing some folks into thinking it's a mediocre rating. Note: It's also possible that the wine switch was a subtle in-joke.
Cheers,
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- One mild criticism of your criticism having to do with the targeted American audience - Audiophilander 10:25:01 07/18/07 (9)
- The wine switch and 5 Star ratings are high-brow gags included to make those who notice such things feel - Tony D. 19:08:30 07/18/07 (8)
- Whereas I view it as a plothole, or a lapse of continuity. - clarkjohnsen 09:57:28 07/19/07 (3)
- No doubt most 'reviewers' will have the same response you did, the Unconcious in protection mode. NT - Tony D. 13:56:31 07/19/07 (1)
- So: Every cinematic problem seen by a critic is proof of his own lack of discernment? - clarkjohnsen 15:00:21 07/19/07 (0)
- ...OR it could be seen as a subtle jab at paid critics who, when push comes to shove, can't tell one thing from another. - Audiophilander 12:31:53 07/19/07 (0)
- "Clark is correct about the old lady and the shot gun, a bit overdone." - Agreed. - Audiophilander 23:02:37 07/18/07 (3)
- Maybe they'll do your life story: "Stump Jumper Jim". * - mr grits 10:46:43 07/19/07 (2)
- They've already done your's, except Tom Hanks played 'Forrest' as being sharper witted. (nt) - Audiophilander 11:12:42 07/19/07 (1)
- Agreed, he was far more athletic and better dressed. * - mr grits 12:19:43 07/19/07 (0)