In Reply to: Michael Clayton posted by Daryl Zero on October 14, 2007 at 09:04:15:
but effective: she appeared to be pregnant in the later scenes, btw, but not in earlier ones. I know films usually aren't filmed in sequence so perhaps she was pregnant earlier on but anyhow it was strange.
Sydney Pollack gave, for once, a good performance.
Clooney?
Carried the film quite well.
By no means a must see but definitely the best of Hollywood so far this year (going on memory here).
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Pretty good, definitely worth seeing. Swinton was very one-dimensional - tinear 15:10:03 10/16/07 (11)
- RE: I thought Swinton did a really good job with a character who was not fleshed out well . . . - Daryl Zero 07:30:30 10/17/07 (0)
- RE: Pretty good, definitely worth seeing. Swinton was very one-dimensional - rico 16:48:12 10/16/07 (9)
- Her character had many scenes and screen-time. No major - tinear 04:41:41 10/17/07 (7)
- Her previous work should have no bearing on judging this one, should it? - rico 07:12:11 10/18/07 (1)
- See my response below to James G. I'd disagree - tinear 12:31:27 10/18/07 (0)
- RE: Her character had many scenes and screen-time. No major - jamesgarvin 07:33:06 10/17/07 (4)
- I don't know if you fully understand the cinematic process. - tinear 11:34:40 10/17/07 (3)
- RE: I don't know if you fully understand the cinematic process. - jamesgarvin 10:30:48 10/19/07 (2)
- One other crucial element... - sjb 10:42:01 10/19/07 (1)
- RE: One other crucial element... - jamesgarvin 13:51:18 10/19/07 (0)
- Orlando is one of my big guilty pleasures....beautiful movie. * - mr grits 18:17:08 10/16/07 (0)