In Reply to: Wow, didn't realize I had to spell it out posted by Analog Scott on April 3, 2007 at 09:10:18:
I understand the difference between the two, just as you understand that not all theaters are showing film at its best.>>>there are projectionists that actually know how to do an excellent job of focusing the projector and keeping it in prime running condition. There are theaters that actually patrol for people being disruptive and there are theaters that actually mop the floor.<<<
I'm sure that is true, but not at the theaters near me. If they are in your area, enjoy it while you can, for I beleive they are a shrinking minority.
I stand by my comments. I got tired of out of focus movies, torn splice joints, crappy sound, and generally miserable watching conditions. I don't like that expereince. If its better for you, then consider yourself fortunate.
Jack
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- No you didn't - Jack G 10:51:43 04/03/07 (10)
- Yes I did. - Analog Scott 11:28:31 04/03/07 (9)
- My point - Jack G 12:18:11 04/03/07 (8)
- your point is not universal - Analog Scott 13:07:05 04/03/07 (7)
- As with people who assert that LPs don't sound better than CDs because of some clicks and pops. That's noise, not sound. - clarkjohnsen 08:47:44 04/04/07 (1)
- No assertion, but if LP noise is present it isn't necessarily closer to the live or studio experience ... - Audiophilander 16:51:20 04/05/07 (0)
- I never said it was. - Jack G 14:02:14 04/03/07 (4)
- this is pointless, lets try to get back on subject. - Analog Scott 15:12:48 04/03/07 (3)
- On the contrary… - David Aiken 17:35:10 04/03/07 (0)
- You're right-my apologies - Jack G 15:17:51 04/03/07 (1)
- Hey no prob - Analog Scott 16:57:08 04/03/07 (0)