In Reply to: Easily the best major film studio release of the year. posted by tinear on April 19, 2007 at 11:07:32:
Messages should be subtle. In CoM, it was painted all over it. Grittiness was novel in the 70s. Its overdone now, and in this film was a serious distraction. The dank trash-strewn set "design" was overpowering. The thick accents blunted what little dialogue there was (we agree). The story was so undercooked that it was undigestable. Its potential power was squandered the maker's insistance that we "get" it. Good editing and camera work were defeated by the flat lighting and too-grim sets.Anytime a film makes me more aware of its gimmicky manipulations and technical failings than the story and characters, the film maker has really blown it. I am thankful, though, that they never went ahead with that smellivision idea for movies.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- There are message movies, and there are sermon movies - DWPC 11:48:23 04/19/07 (4)
- One's "flat lighting" is another's "not overlit". nt - clarkjohnsen 07:35:19 04/21/07 (1)
- Besides, the light in London is always so directional and hard -never soft or overcast. n/t - Vinylized 08:45:51 04/23/07 (0)
- No, I don't recall any lecturing in the film. I actually thought it was - tinear 16:09:45 04/19/07 (0)
- Re: There are message movies, and there are sermon movies - Vinylized 13:22:07 04/19/07 (0)