|
Films/DVD Asylum Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star. |
|
|
|
Films/DVD Asylum Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Brilliant remark on Mummy sequel posted by Doug Schneider on May 5, 2001 at 14:34:23:
have to agree with you there, Doug. But, without the effects, the movie was nothing. I think that's backward. The effects should serve the movie, not the other way 'round.An example of a movie without digital effects was "Crouching Tiger." Perhaps the limitations imposed by the lack of a bank of Sun workstations made the story a little better.
I also agree with you about Phantom -- way too much computer, not enough "flesh and blood." Memo to George L. from a person who's seen the orginal Star Wars trilogy more times than I'm willing to admit: Just because it can be done by a computer does not mean that it should be done that way.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Matrix effects - Bruce from DC 19:44:05 05/07/01 (14)
- Re: Matrix effects - CH Chang 21:13:48 05/07/01 (13)
- The King of Monsters still rules. - john dem 16:20:14 05/08/01 (10)
- Re: The King of Monsters still rules. - Rob Doorack 10:06:20 05/10/01 (8)
- Re: The King of Monsters still rules. - john dem 21:58:51 05/10/01 (6)
- Re: The King of Monsters still rules. - Rob Doorack 22:58:14 05/10/01 (5)
- H-Man vs Santo- Now that's a B movie! - john dem 23:24:02 05/10/01 (4)
- Santo: we need him now more than ever. - Rob Doorack 12:53:58 05/11/01 (0)
- Re: The King of Monsters still rules. - Jack G 17:24:57 05/10/01 (0)
- Quite right.. - Jack G 16:45:21 05/08/01 (0)
- Re: digital eraser - Bruce from DC 09:23:22 05/08/01 (1)
- Re: digital eraser - CH Chang 16:16:49 05/08/01 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
