In Reply to: I Think We Are Diametrically Opposed On This Issue. posted by AudioHead on May 21, 2001 at 13:21:37:
So you would have us believe that this unmotivated murder was simply >>a cheap, contrived plot device inserted for surprise effect<< rather than admit that the colonel was a latent homosexual who murdered the only witness to this fact?>>Assuming the Colonel was really gay and indeed thought Lester was gay, it seems that rejection would be the reason. However, this hardly
seems a valid motive for murder<<What are >>valid<< motives for murder?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Better latent than never? - Stephen Hayes 18:01:43 05/21/01 (0)