In Reply to: She's homely and misshaped, not exactly the stuff of leading posted by tinear on January 10, 2008 at 04:43:54:
(A) You mean like the straight as a board, kinky haired Kate Hepburn? Or the frumpy Debra Winger? Or the rough around the edges Gena Rowlands? Or the owl eyed, boyishly physiqued Bette Davis?
(B) What romantic roles has she had?
(C) She is not a leading actress, but rather a character actress.
(D) She is married to actor Peter Saarsgard. I suspect he had other options.
(E) What hype are you referring to? Demi Moore was hyped, and her career has, ahem, deflated in reverse proportion to her surgically enhanced breasts.
(F) Odd, those so called advocates for change, for the downtrodden, who argue that the legally and socially disposessed treated as second class citizens, such as women have histortically been, by a society that primarily focuses on their physical features, are, in fact, as big a chauvinist pig as the worst offender. Hypocrites.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: She's homely and misshaped, not exactly the stuff of leading - jamesgarvin 07:57:44 01/10/08 (0)