In Reply to: Um... that's the character... in both the book it was based on and when Glenn Ford played the role in 1957. posted by sjb on January 28, 2008 at 12:24:48:
point aside, a cold-blooded recitation of events hardly bears comparison to a film, does it? Or are the many creative artists involved in a film, from the director on down (or sideways), just reporters (that always have biases, too...)?
Read "Lolita" (if you can...) and see Kubrick's version. COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.
But each praised as a classic.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I'm sure you agree that artists take... artistic license when needed. But, that - tinear 14:25:24 01/28/08 (0)