another depressing, abrupt-ending "art" film from America.
Daniel Day-Lewis is powerful, yes, but the writing is so poor he has few memorable scenes, lines. The basic story-telling is terrible. The music is okay but at times is repetitive and extreme. The palette is yellow-brown and rapidly becomes boring.
Lewis is on screen for the entire film and that's part of the problem. No other character is anywhere near as powerful, as well-drawn. There is NOTHING for him to play against.
And, please, don't bother with that silly argument that it's true to the book.
Donatello and Michaelangelo both sculpted highly thought of "Davids" but they're as dissimilar as possible. Artists make art, they don't slavishly copy.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - "There Will be Blood:" yet - tinear 16:04:31 02/02/08 (9)
- RE: "There Will be Blood:" yet - Jim in Blacksburg 18:55:31 02/06/08 (0)
- You're right, for once. * - mr grits 09:29:30 02/03/08 (0)
- Does DDL's character have big red nose? - DWPC 09:12:41 02/03/08 (0)
- I still say - DavidLD 08:40:48 02/03/08 (1)
- AMPAS tend to prefer a more "composed" style of sound score. - Harmonia 14:57:08 02/05/08 (0)
- RE: "There Will be Blood:" yet - Daryl Zero 07:46:28 02/03/08 (0)
- I was disappointed in There will be Blood - PhilJ 05:00:55 02/03/08 (0)
- And, please, don't bother with that silly argument that it's true to the book." If you'd read it you'd know - Tony D. 23:22:12 02/02/08 (0)
- It sound like they tried too hard?! (nt - Eldragon 17:55:26 02/02/08 (0)