I strongly disagree, obviously.

I find PoA (as do a lot of fans) to be the best so far, the first HP movie that - although not a literal adpatation of the text - was the first to capture the *feeling* of reading the books...especially the wit. it is very graceful and cinematic but not literal, which was a problem for some fans. It is the most polished and sophisticated HP visually, and like it or nor, it sustained its tone from start to finish. Cuaron also got the best ever perf from Emma Watson and kept Gambon on target. the supporting roles, especially David thewlis, were excellent as usual. It wasn't flawless - the werewolf design was a bit didgy - but the rest was IMO brilliant, commercial filmmaking of a high order.

I thought Mike Newell managed neither the pacing nor the acting - many of the performances were a bit screechy, especially Gambon's. Newell couldn't really shape GoF toward much of a climax either, as it lumbered and lurched through the 3 tasks. He was saved at the end by the sheer acting power of Ralph Fiennes as Voldemort. Several individual scenes were quite good, but it never added up to more than the sum of its parts. Newell, whose light touch was aprpeciated in the scenes of the young wizzards and witches pairing up for the Yule Ball, was less successful in his staging of the big FX scenes, with the notable exception of the dragon on the rooftop sequence.

Peter Yates was next best for me with order Of The Phoenix, a daunting, sprawling book to adapt if ever there was one. Yates has done outstanding work for the BBC (The Way We Live Now) and has a deft touch with actors. AFAIC OotP jettisoned about the right amount and kept the essentials and the movie finished with a bang with the scenes at the MoM. The emotional arc was clear throughout and Yates proved to be a surprisingly able visual storyteller. Best of all - he kept Gambon in check. Dumbledore was back.

The two HPs of Chris Columbus, that noted hack, are almost unwatchable to me now. Too literal, too plodding andstatic, good enough material and great actors hampered by a pedestrian imagination. The casting is well nigh perfect, the scripts good enough and that's what saves them for me.

So for me:

HP3

HP5

HP4

HP1&2

YMMV :-)

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Guillermo Del Toro likely to helm The Hobbit. - Harmonia 21:22:16 01/29/08 (14)

So, Hobbits are going to look like big crickets? * - mr grits 11:41:47 01/30/08 (13)

LOL, actually... - Harmonia 16:34:00 01/30/08 (10)

"..add his own touches"....RED ALERT! Wrong-On. Stop production. Not good. * - mr grits 19:43:52 01/30/08 (9)

Del Toro is a far better director than Jackson - Jazz Inmate 09:02:16 02/01/08 (3)

I dunno about "far" better... - Harmonia 21:02:15 02/02/08 (0)

"Ok, Bilbo, in thees scene you look really, really, reeeeally horny." * - mr grits 11:52:47 02/01/08 (1)

"Oh, Gandalf," looking longingly into his eyes, "I'm so glad you're here." - Jazz Inmate 16:41:15 02/01/08 (0)

Not necessarily. - Harmonia 23:54:04 01/30/08 (4)

I hated HP3.....one of the worst in the series....del Toro IS an - TWB 11:31:35 02/01/08 (3)

This pretty much sums up my reaction to HP3... - Harmonia 21:11:18 02/02/08 (0)

I strongly disagree, obviously. - Harmonia 20:52:41 02/02/08 (1)

"I disagree...obviously".....funny I prefer/like them in the order in which they have been made.... - TWB 21:07:24 02/03/08 (0)

Yep, just with hairier feet. [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 15:04:37 01/30/08 (0)

LOL! (nt) - mkuller 12:07:30 01/30/08 (0)

Follow Ups

I strongly disagree, obviously. - Harmonia 20:52:41 02/02/08 (1)

"I disagree...obviously".....funny I prefer/like them in the order in which they have been made.... - TWB 21:07:24 02/03/08 (0)

I strongly disagree, obviously.

Post a Message!