In Reply to: RE: Well that was written as ...fullnote. posted by patrickU on March 10, 2008 at 01:22:09:
patrickU, I totally understand your relecutance to revisit this much discussed topic.
I remember, even though I was a mere youth when the picture was released, the great controversy over it. I remember seeing it and being baffled, yet mesmerized. It is a forbidding film to this day, and its rather radical cinematic approach still puts people off. It has a way of asking the audience to look for meaning in places that most films don't, to turn cinemea itself into a form of experience, rather than a means of story-telling.
I thank you for the link, and I respect your point of view here. The reference to Eliot was meant in earnest.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Well that was written as ...fullnote. - halfnote 21:18:53 03/10/08 (3)
- RE: Well that was written as ...fullnote. - patrickU 07:01:54 03/11/08 (2)
- RE: Well that was written as ...fullnote. - halfnote 21:20:00 03/11/08 (1)
- RE: Well that was written as ...fullnote. - patrickU 05:26:03 03/12/08 (0)