In Reply to: It was 16 years too early. nt.. posted by Duilawyer on March 30, 2008 at 17:22:59:
... and a prediction of the near future from the viewpoint of 1946 I do not think it too inaccurate.
The change was as I understand it made on the advice of the publisher who thought people were too pleased the war was over to buy into such a bleak view of the future so soon.
Anyway, you can only call a film historically inaccurate if it is based on real events in the past.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- as the book was originally intended to be called 1948... - dave c 22:04:01 03/30/08 (0)