In Reply to: Go back and notice her costuming. Legs: yes. Butt? Sideways or posted by tinear on July 6, 2008 at 12:19:17:
I'm not going to argue the size of her thighs. just sayin they weren't being deliberately hidden in the Get Smart moive I saw.
>> Several reviewers I've read since posting also found her "wooden.">>
Reviewers are a dime a dozen. Many of them are just hacks who couldn't make it in film. I don't care about their opinions.
>> She also seemed rather bitchy for a comedy, in the first 2/3rds. Poorly written or poor acting?>>
You can't tell if it was writen that way or an acting choice?
>> Anyhow, since you're an insider, go take a look in person.....
and report back.>>
Already did at the press junket. She did not look particularly huge in the butt or thighs to me but I didn't really look for it.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Maybe I don't know anatomy that well. thighs are part of the legs no? - Analog Scott 12:45:37 07/06/08 (2)
- So to be a film critic one must be able to "make it in film?" That - tinear 15:16:29 07/07/08 (1)
- That is the most bizarre backassward logic I've seen in a while - Analog Scott 17:51:10 07/07/08 (0)