In Reply to: "...in the history of film, surely there is no more powerful a performance..." posted by sjb on July 7, 2008 at 15:46:03:
36-24-36, for instance, is not a ratio.
I started watching it a couple weeks ago but decided to save it for... later...
The beginning at least was way overwrought.
Also I developed a slight distaste from its overt sympathy for the occupiers of another country, a country moreover that they had brutalized ("Bataan Death March") -- not that they hadn't done the same stuff to other members of their "co-prosperity sphere".
I do plan on returning some day, and the transfer was excellent.
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- What's a four-part ratio? - clarkjohnsen 08:42:55 07/09/08 (4)
- Stick to links. "Sympathy?" "Overwrought?" (slight nodding of the head....) nt - tinear 13:11:45 07/09/08 (0)
- Tin likes to include thighs (along with waist, hips bust) in his evaluation of actressess - sjb 08:46:50 07/09/08 (2)
- Naughty. When a woman is cast in a role for her physical attributes, to - tinear 13:03:11 07/09/08 (0)
- Ah! Of course! Forgetful of me... nt - clarkjohnsen 09:34:42 07/09/08 (0)