In Reply to: RE: Salo posted by patrickU on November 14, 2008 at 03:22:00:
Pasolini can be strong stuff and Salo in particular is very hard for me to watch even now. I haven't seen it in several years, and I'm not sure how eager I am to see it again soon - although I *will* see it again, especially with the new Criterion out.
Salo is best approached after reading about it from a film history perspective. This is a movie that really does need a guide and context for many viewers. It's a masterpiece, one of the strongest condemntions ever made of fascism, but it's not for casual watching. I understand why many people are unwilling to even try.
Below is one of the most detailed analysis I've ever read about it - there's also quite a bit about Pasolini's other films on this site, Jim's Reviews.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Agreed, One must be prepared. - Harmonia 13:01:25 11/14/08 (5)
- RE: Agreed, One must be prepared. - patrickU 03:08:52 11/15/08 (4)
- I adore Preston Sturges, and how odd... - Harmonia 22:25:54 11/15/08 (3)
- RE: I adore Preston Sturges, and how odd... - patrickU 02:43:47 11/16/08 (0)
- Erm, the problem with cutting and pasting... - Harmonia 22:30:00 11/15/08 (1)
- RE: Erm, the problem with cutting and pasting... - patrickU 01:15:59 11/16/08 (0)