In Reply to: but love and hate are nearly the same thing, Tin (spoiler) posted by dave c on January 27, 2009 at 04:17:16:
in projecting all sorts of meanings. That's fine, of course, but a work should be consistent and give some basis for interpretation, for discussion. Winslet's character was poorly fleshed out, showing no disenchantment or even much pique with how things must have been. DiCaprio, perhaps because of his star status, never was shown particularly to be a bad husband. Winslet never was shown, to go with your interpretation, as being indifferent to him.
But we're discussing stuff which a well-written film shows.
RE: the book. I have little knowledge of it but, because of the abortion, it does make one wonder at the timing? Like with the timing of "Defiance," I have my suspicions that producers aren't dart-throwers.
I just think Winslet's character woefully under-drawn for the momentous act she undertook.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- To explain the movie, you indulge - tinear 07:07:14 01/27/09 (4)
- "never was shown particularly to be a bad husband" - dave c 22:52:43 01/27/09 (3)
- A guy, in how many years of marriage, - tinear 07:37:26 01/29/09 (2)
- Bohemians - Tom Brennan 16:54:38 02/02/09 (0)
- "never cared for him, never loved him" - dave c 12:47:32 01/29/09 (0)