In Reply to: RE: Hey boy. It " they " would not want any comments they should not post part of the film.. posted by patrickU on August 26, 2009 at 00:18:55:
>>> "Remember what I sad about King Kong? - You like that film." >>>
By far better than the De Laurentiis version, but no raves. Your opinion of Peter Jackson's King Kong, OTOH, was excessively critical in that bizarre Grey Poupon-it manner that you're known to excel with when trolling for responses.
Cheers,
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "Remember what I sad..." - Everything you say is sad. - Audiophilander 13:56:54 08/26/09 (7)
- RE: "Remember what I sad..." - Everything you say is sad. - patrickU 03:22:30 08/27/09 (4)
- Being vulgar doesn't give your subjective criticisms any greater weight. - Audiophilander 10:58:42 08/27/09 (3)
- RE: Being vulgar is the prerogative of the intellectual--- - patrickU 11:16:39 08/27/09 (2)
- No, being vulgar is the sanctuary of armchair critics who desperately want to be perceived as intellectuals. - Audiophilander 11:49:28 08/27/09 (1)
- RE: armchair critics ..No I am like you the lonesome cowboy. nt - patrickU 12:34:29 08/27/09 (0)
- Are you done watching Mother Goose? - Victor Khomenko 19:48:48 08/26/09 (1)
- Check your local library or video store, or borrow patrick's copy. - Audiophilander 22:06:29 08/26/09 (0)