In Reply to: Sherlock Holmes... posted by mkuller on January 3, 2010 at 20:51:30:
or people at risk. You think.... the public makes a "victim?"
Have you been holding your breath for forty years to see an impersonation of "Jaws" from that old 007 film? Well, you'll love this Holmes, then. Heck, you even get to see TWO lengthy fights with that guy against Holmes.
The women, I have to repeat, are the holmliest I've seen in any major film. The average American (or South American) soap has more feminine pulchritude. No excuse for that except that Ritchie, the director, is the ex of Madonna. Compared to her, yes, they are beautiful.
Okay, enough. I'm sorry. Expending this much effort beating this dead horse of a movie is wasted effort.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Sherlock? A "D." No suspense to solve the riddles, no beautiful damsels in distress - tinear 07:47:06 01/05/10 (4)
- I found it highly entertaining. - sjb 17:29:55 01/06/10 (0)
- the film attempted to give the supernatural angle some intrigue. YMMV - Jazz Inmate 22:39:58 01/05/10 (2)
- " Moriarty come back from the dead"? DID YOU EVEN WATCH THE MOVIE? n/t - PCL 11:15:20 01/07/10 (0)
- Good word, "attempted." nt - tinear 08:00:37 01/06/10 (0)