In Reply to: Just saw the last thirty seconds of Modern Time- Just when Chaplin and Goddard -- posted by patrickU on January 8, 2010 at 06:44:37:
of the figures is deeply flawed. The animals in the film are ridiculous, on a par with many children's films like "Star Wars." What people are applauding is the 3-D improvement. How many raves about it when the viewer sees it in 2-D?
"2012" was a fun ride and the FX were believable, Woody was entertaining as hell, and Cusack was fine.
"Avatar" was like going to a cheap carnival and having the barker yell out political slogans.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- #1: the FX in "Avatar" really aren't "natural" looking at all, the movement - tinear 07:58:51 01/08/10 (5)
- No offense, ... - Audiophilander 11:48:44 01/08/10 (2)
- Blue Jar Jar Binks. Art engages the mind and the senses. Just - tinear 12:40:23 01/08/10 (1)
- RE: You speak to a one who found King Kong a good film....nt - patrickU 01:29:03 01/15/10 (0)
- RE: #1: the FX in "Avatar" really aren't "natural" looking at all, the movement - patrickU 08:37:53 01/08/10 (0)
- "How many raves about it when the viewer sees it in 2-D?" - Wendell Narrod 08:13:38 01/08/10 (0)