In Reply to: Wow! posted by Victor Khomenko on January 23, 2010 at 11:15:52:
pretty amazed that this book and movie could have been openly produced at any time in the soviet era. I'm equally puzzled that the film isn't better known. Apparently the book was "banned" from publishing for 60 years. As you say, one is compelled to wonder how in the world did Bulgakov escape a quiet state bullet in the head?
The political overtones of it are blatant.
Brilliant, surgical, for-the-masses insight into the simmering chaos and inevitable breakdown of revolutionary man's creations - technological, social or otherwise, absent humility. Whether on a personal or committee level.
There were times when I stopped action or turned the sound off to gauge my impression. The strength and character of the story is still there in the sheer images. What vividly-drawn characters, including the weather, the spare street life, the rickety contraptions, the imposing little desperation in everything.
I may read the book but my intuition is that the film is a successful adaptation and carries Bulgakov's weight very well. I'm still mulling the film and want to watch again. In seeing it for the first time last night I thought of Chaplin, Renoir, the Marx brothers, Carroll, Bunuel......
For me it is top rank movie making. Everybody who loves film needs to know about it.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Mostly I'm .... - afilado 18:17:57 01/23/10 (1)
- RE: Mostly I'm .... - Victor Khomenko 19:17:41 01/23/10 (0)