In Reply to: Puxatony Phil (not Puxatony PhilJ) :^D posted by PhilJ on February 1, 2010 at 06:13:53:
(nt)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Ahem...that would be "Punxsutawney Phil"...(nt) - mkuller 11:33:58 02/01/10 (1)
- funny I see both when I do a search but you look correct sir! - PhilJ 13:57:38 02/01/10 (0)