In Reply to: There is a very large experiential difference between reading posted by tinear on May 16, 2010 at 11:18:20:
And the usual US pornification of violence.
So obviously nothing to upset the little dears. Cate only even undresses behind some inexplicably sheer curtains.
A lost lamb of a film.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- very little blood - dave c 13:27:01 05/16/10 (9)
- Well, for me, it'll be "The Silence of the Lambs." Enough crappy - tinear 14:49:58 05/16/10 (7)
- Very scathing analysis... - dave c 19:29:16 05/16/10 (6)
- I've never drunk a shit shake, either. You'd drink one to form an opinion? nt - tinear 09:24:42 05/17/10 (5)
- See it, don't see it, why would you want to write about eating shit? - dave c 13:45:33 05/17/10 (4)
- Because the film is of that quality. BTW, I didn't invent that metaphor. It may help - tinear 07:50:17 05/21/10 (0)
- This place ..... - afilado 20:46:01 05/19/10 (0)
- RE: See it, don't see it, why would you want to write about eating shit? - mpathus 18:29:14 05/17/10 (1)
- Good choice... - dave c 20:56:23 05/17/10 (0)
- "A lost lamb of a film".... - afilado 13:51:52 05/16/10 (0)