In Reply to: 2012... Sorry to bring this up again... posted by SF tech on July 22, 2010 at 12:07:42:
I couldn't even watch 300 after the first 30 minutes or so because somehow they even made the actors look fake. And with appologies to it's many fans, Avatar was really nothing more than an a cartoon. Of course this film was many notches below Avatar, but too much reliance on fx and especially CGI ruins many of todays major Hollywood releases.
CGI can be great when a film doesn't rely on it to keep the viewer interested, but when it's clearly the star of the film it's better to be prepared for the worst. And unfortunately, that's usually what you get.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Video game comes to mind with many big $$ films... - DFaulds 07:02:49 07/23/10 (4)
- 300 was great - Brian A 10:34:30 07/23/10 (3)
- Sorry I just couldn't get past... - DFaulds 10:48:07 07/23/10 (2)
- It was based on a graphic-novel: "300". It was supposed to look that way . . . - mr grits 20:45:10 07/25/10 (0)
- Yup, it looked like a cartoon and the characters looked like a bunch of aging - tinear 17:09:43 07/25/10 (0)