It started very very slowly, empty seemingly so, with Enrico music filling the gap or trying to.
I thought, no not another Kill Bill, a kind of III.
But it was not it just set the whole film and that did took off.
And how.
Firmly and deeply it described the mentality and the inexorable count down of what must happen.
Tarantino is a great movie buff and he thrown out what he has seen and understood in his live as a spectator.
I can understand that some people will not like it.
I enjoy it, much of that.
Save Brad Pitt, bad.
I can only bow in front of it. It show a profound understanding of the second world war.
Not one false note I could detect.
Now it is not a film I would like to see twice.
That make for me all the difference to other great chef d´oeuvre.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Inglourious Basterds - patrickU 12:31:41 07/23/10 (12)
- I think Pitt is a fine actor. I think Tarantino makes BAD movies. - jeffreybehr 18:40:22 07/27/10 (2)
- You are right. - mbnx01 11:08:16 07/29/10 (0)
- RE: You think wrong. - patrickU 12:43:47 07/28/10 (0)
- RE: Inglourious Basterds - Larry I 12:03:16 07/26/10 (2)
- RE: Inglourious Basterds - RGA 16:52:31 07/26/10 (0)
- RE: Inglourious Basterds - patrickU 13:03:22 07/26/10 (0)
- RE: Inglourious Basterds - Albert B. Broman 13:58:47 07/23/10 (5)
- RE: Inglourious Basterds - patrickU 00:21:38 07/24/10 (0)
- Some have a closed mind regarding Brad. He's been good in several films, including - tinear 16:39:58 07/23/10 (3)
- Best performance, IMHO, Kalifornia ^ - Road Warrior 10:42:14 07/24/10 (2)
- Yes, he was great in that. Spoiler. - Tony D. 15:44:01 07/24/10 (0)
- RE: Best performance, IMHO, Kalifornia ^ - Dave Mester 11:39:55 07/24/10 (0)