In Reply to: The society is whole lot dumber now, thanks to him and others posted by Victor Khomenko on October 11, 2010 at 18:39:33:
I wonder what you would think of the product I'm trying to develop.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: The society is whole lot dumber now, thanks to him and others - Jazz Inmate 20:35:51 10/11/10 (20)
- "You're gonna have to serve somebody" - Victor Khomenko 06:09:50 10/12/10 (19)
- Evolution IS true and residents of developed countries measurable - tinear 11:58:38 10/13/10 (1)
- I shall consider the super-thumbs the only serious proof of evolution - Victor Khomenko 12:14:34 10/13/10 (0)
- RE: "You're gonna have to serve somebody" - dean_martin 13:56:52 10/12/10 (6)
- They are safe... for now... BTW, why is "...book" limited to "face" if... - Victor Khomenko 10:45:34 10/13/10 (5)
- Obviously you NEVER write opinions based on vague impressions rooted in ignorance and laziness.... - Dr Phibes 05:30:29 10/14/10 (3)
- It is always like that... you dare to criticize their idol, they turn personal - Victor Khomenko 07:21:42 10/14/10 (2)
- Vic the relevant question was "How long did you research Facebook before sharing your superior insights?" - Analog Scott 08:19:53 10/18/10 (0)
- "It is always like that".. Yes. Because digging through your pathetic gobbledygook is both laughable... - Dr Phibes 08:05:01 10/14/10 (0)
- That's funny. (Lol for the facebook generation.) nt - dean_martin 13:07:07 10/13/10 (0)
- Right, evolution was/is truth. But you are wrong. - Gandra1 10:13:02 10/12/10 (9)
- "Right, evolution was/is truth." LOL! But it will not be in the future! :) nt - Victor Khomenko 11:34:43 10/12/10 (0)
- RE: Right, evolution was/is truth. But you are wrong. - Jazz Inmate 10:33:56 10/12/10 (7)
- "Idiocracy" is here and now. n/t - dean_martin 13:53:49 10/12/10 (6)
- And some of us thought that way 30 years ago... - Victor Khomenko 10:43:14 10/13/10 (5)
- How about 1964? - dean_martin 13:03:05 10/13/10 (4)
- Shouldn´t you have said "the age of arguing" or "of duologue", instead of " of dialogue"...? (nt) - orejones 02:16:19 10/14/10 (2)
- I don't know. . . - dean_martin 09:59:05 10/14/10 (1)
- It is a shame too much has been said about the need to "communicate" but not the need... - Victor Khomenko 15:04:02 10/14/10 (0)
- "regardless of whether they should or not," That is brilliant! - Victor Khomenko 13:06:36 10/13/10 (0)